|
|
![]()
July 29, 1998
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF AUGUST 5, 1998, MEETING. TOPIC AREA MEETING COVERING STUDY PART F (RELIABILITY & SERVICE QUALITY).
Dear Interested Persons:
On August 5, we will convene a meeting to solicit your input on one section of the study of the states electricity industry that we are conducting under the provisions of ESSB 6560. This meeting will be designed to elicit your views on section F of the study, which deals with reliability and service quality issues. Instructions on how to get to the meeting are attached.
PROPOSED AGENDA:
August 5, 1998 Topic Area Meeting 6560 Study Section F (only)
9:30 - Introductions Review Agenda 9:45 - Reliability Clarifying Questions on Data Survey Section F 10:15 - Reliability Trends & Ways to Ensure High Reliability in the Future 12:15 - Lunch (on your own) 1:15 - Reliability Discussion Continued 2:15 - Service Quality Clarifying Questions on Data Survey Section F, Service Quality Trends & Ways to Ensure High Service Quality in the Future 3:45 - Discuss Next Steps 4:00 - Adjourn
Also attached are descriptions that we previously distributed on how we intend to approach these sections of the study. To help you prepare, we describe below a bit more about our approach and how you can participate.
MEETING GOALS
Section F deals with service quality and reliability. Reliability is expected to take the majority of our time, therefore we will address it first and leave service quality until the afternoon. Depending on the results of the meeting, we may need to make future data requests and provide additional opportunities for stake-holder input and discussion.
We perceive the section meeting to have three goals:
STUDY PROCESSES
"Study the current level of service quality and reliability as measured by available statistics."
This issue will be addressed primarily through the data request and analysis process.
"Study trends affecting service quality and the reliability of the distribution system."
This issue will be addressed partly through the data request process provided good time series data becomes available.
This issue also will be addressed qualitatively beginning in the section meeting, to develop issues to study and to discuss them.
"Study ways to ensure high service quality and reliability in the future."
This issue will be addressed qualitatively beginning in the section meeting to develop issues to study and to discuss them.
MEETING DISCUSSION ISSUES
Issue 1: Distribution System Reliability
Extensive changes have already occurred in the electric utility industry and alternatives are being discussed for further deregulation. The changes that have already occurred and the degree to which other aspects are deregulated and how, may have implications for reliability. For example, unbundled services, alternative retail rate structures and franchise options would create different incentives for distribution system investment. How has reliability already been affected by industry changes and what are the implications of further deregulation? What strategies could be implemented to ensure high reliability in the future?
Issue 2: Transmission System Operations
The breakup of traditionally integrated utility functions and the influx of new industry players has changed the responsibilities and incentives for generating and transmission operations. What are the implications for reliability and what strategies could be implemented to ensure high reliability in the future?
Issue 3: Resource Capacity
Supply sufficiency is partly a function of generating and transmission capacity. What are current trends in the development of resource capacity relative to load? Will there be sufficient incentive to build resource capacity in the future under market conditions? Will the ratio of resource capacity to load be different under market conditions than in the past? Is this ratio relevant? What strategies could be implemented to ensure high reliability in the future?
Issue 4: Power Quality
Customers continue to increase their reliance on electricity for critical services and equipment is increasingly more sensitive to power quality. What implications does this have for reliability and what strategies could be implemented to ensure high power quality in the future?
Issue 5: Investment Alternatives
The following matrix lists a variety of investment alternatives faced by each utility. Please come prepared to discuss each alternative and the role it should play in the development of reliability for utility customers. Aspects such as cost, cost-effectiveness, distribution of benefits and costs, importance to reliability and the implications of market conditions may all inform the discussion. What strategies could be implemented to ensure the best investment alternatives are selected?
Investment Alternatives Matrix
Action |
How important is this action to reliability? |
What is the cost and cost-effectiveness of this action? |
How are the benefits and costs of this action distributed? |
What are market implications for this action? |
What are alternative strategies to ensure this action is implemented? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability is a "top" company priority | |||||
| Develop a utility "Reliability Plan" | |||||
Conduct reliability planning:
|
|||||
| Develop an Emergency Response Plan | |||||
| Conduct Emergency Response Planning & Training | |||||
Nature of workforce:
|
|||||
| Construction standards | |||||
| Equipment quality | |||||
| Nature of equipment (such as metal instead of wood poles) | |||||
Vegetation Management:
|
|||||
Maintenance:
|
|||||
| Undergrounding | |||||
| Looping & other redundancies | |||||
| Upgrade and interconnect transmission & distribution grids with neighboring utilities | |||||
Specialty programs & equipment:
|
|||||
| Distributed generation | |||||
| Conservation | |||||
| Data management capabilities | |||||
On-site solutions
|
|||||
Special issues:
|
|||||
| Other? |
Issue 6: Service Quality
For the purposes of this study, service quality is limited to the way in which companies interact with their customers (i.e., customer service). This definition would include, but is not limited to, elements such as the customers ability to contact the company for billing or other company policy questions; the companys ability to meet the commitments it makes to customers for on-site visits for repair, installation or other service issues; the level of customer complaints; and meter reading and billing issues. What elements within service quality do companies consider important now and in the future? How do companies currently ensure they maintain high service quality standards? How have changes in the industry affected service quality? What are the implications for service quality of further deregulation? What strategies could be implemented to ensure high service quality in the future?
We are looking forward to a constructive discussion of the issues affecting part (f) of the 6560 study and particularly look forward to your suggestions and comments.
See you on Wednesday the 5th of August.
[If you are not able to attend the meeting, you can provide suggestions and comments on these sections of the study through our general e-mail address wepg@ep.cted.wa.gov or by mail]
Sincerely,
| Dick Byers Energy Policy Specialist Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission |
K.C. Golden Assistant Director, Energy Division Washington Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development |
Study 6560 web site: http://www.cted.wa.gov/energy/archive//6560 (includes a list of agency contacts, phone numbers and e-mail addresses).
General e-mail: wepg@ep.cted.wa.gov
| Fax: | Karen Dunn, CTED (360) 956-2180 |
| Chris Vernon, WUTC (360) 586-1150 |
CTED Energy Policy Home Page | Study 6560 Home | WUTC Home Page
| This page was last modified October 24, 2001. |
|
| CTED Energy Policy Group PO Box 43173 Olympia, Washington 98504-3173 (360) 956-2096 (phone) (360) 956-2180 (fax) |
Washington
Utilities and Transportation Commission PO Box 47250 Olympia, Washington 98504-7250 (360) 753-6420 (phone) (360) 586-1150 (fax) |
Send comments to wepg@ep.cted.wa.gov |